![]() The shooting bench (click to enlarge) ![]() The setup: Shotgun, Chronograph, and Target (click to enlarge) |
Condition and Equipment Used. Firearm: Stevens 38B bolt-action shotgun 3-inch and 2.5-inch 410 shotgun with a 24inch full choke barrel. Range: 25yards to target Targets: 12-inch diameter (8-ring) Dirty Bird target. Conditions: Partly sunny early afternoon about 68F gentle breeze. Chronograph: Alpha Chony with passive sky screen and remote interface In this second set of slug tests I did not do terminal testing. My goal in this test was to get velocity data for some of the 3-inch slugs that I could not test with my 2.5 inch chambered Winchester 9410. For some comparisons I also re-chrono'ed some of the 2.5 inch slugs to see if the difference between a cylinder bore and a full choke on velocity. Finally I wanted to document group sizes of various slugs when fired through a full choke gun. I am then going to remove the full choke and repeat the test to see if there is an accuracy improvement with a cylinder bore in the same gun. |
![]() |
One thing to note about the shotgun was my sights were less than optimal. I did not want to put a lot of effort into sights before deciding how I am going to remove the full choke. So for sights I used the front bead and a piece of coffee stirrer taped to the receiver to make a rear ghost ring. I have plans for better sights but those will be installed after that choke has been removed. None the less I believed the sights proved sufficient for shooting for groups. The ghost ring formed by the straw was nearly the same diameter as the target at 25 yard in my field of vision so alignment was pretty good. The lack of a rib though meant heat mirage was a serious problem after the first few shots of each group. I was not overly concerned with point of impact. |
|
Conclusions: Well... as expected the full choke did not shoot very good groups. My Winchester 9410 with a cylinder bore produced 2 inch groups at 50 yards and only one slug tested manage that at 25 yards. Substantial velocity was lost in all of the 2.5 inch slug tested compared to the velocity measured in my Winchester 9410. Now the question is was that velocity lost due to the full choke (both barrel where 24 inches long) or from gases escaping around the slug as it left the mouth of the shell and before it entered the forcing cone. I suspect it is the long chamber. If you look at the data for the Federal slug it lost very little velocity and I think this is because by using the long one piece gas seal-wad less pressure is lost since the slug is nearly in the bore before the gas seal has left the shell. With the Remington Slugger that uses what appears to be shot-buffer to fill the shell and a simple cardboard over powder wad I suspect that buffer just gets blow past the slug in the chamber resulting in significant velocity lost. Even the mighty modified Brenneke* fell victim to the velocity lost in the longer chamber. As expected the Brenneke slug continues to perform the best both in energy and accuracy. For being a hard slug fired from a full choke barrel the accuracy was impressive. They are consistently the highest energy slug available. They are my overwhelming favorite for deer hunting with a 410 at this point. The Barnaul slugs are a pleasant surprise they shot OK groups and I think in a cylinder bore accuracy will improve and they are cheap at present. Another surprise was the Federal Slugs. In my Winchester 9410 the grouped the worst. In the Stevens they were the second best grouping slug. They also maintained their velocity the best of the 2.5 inch slugs tested in the 3 inch chamber. |
| Click here to return to index |